•  
  •  
 

Abstract

Aim:Use of cage and bone graft for decompression and fixation cervical spineMethods:Fourty patients between june2004 _ june 2006 , evaluated by physical and neurological examination with radiograby by x Ray and MRI . the treated by anterior disectomy and replaced by cage and bone graft.Results:Regarding the site of disc prolapsed (10%) between C4 - 5(65%) between C5 -6 and (25%) between C6-7 . 37 patients treated disectomy by and bone graft while two Patient treated by corpectopmy of C5,6 body The complete recovery presented in 80% , incomplete recovery in 7,5% while no any improvement in 2,5%Conclusion:Immediate stability with good clinical improvement and no graft morbidity are the advantage of this implant compared to conventional interbody grafting techniques .

Article Type

Article

First Page

159

Last Page

166

Rights

Copyright (c) 2017 AL-QADISIYAH MEDICAL JOURNAL

Share

COinS